Prohibited Practices Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

Posted by admin on May 14, 2012  |   No Comments »

final rule issued by the U.S.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission addresses prohibited policies and practices relating to older workers under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), a federal law that applies generally to private employers with 20 or more employees.

Purpose of the ADEA
The ADEA prohibits employment discrimination against people who are 40 years of age or older.

In addition to intentional discrimination, the ADEA prohibits practices that, although neutral on their face, have the effect of harming older workers more than younger workers, unless the employer can show that the practice is based on a reasonable factor other than age.

The final rule explains the meaning of the reasonable factor other than age defense.

Final Rule Emphasizes Need for Individual Review
According to the final rule, an employment practice is based on a reasonable factor other than age when it was reasonably designed and administered to achieve a legitimate business purpose in light of the circumstances, including its potential harm to older workers.

The rule emphasizes the need for an individualized review of the facts and circumstances of a particular situation, and includes a list of considerations for assessing reasonableness.

Generally, an employer would be required to prove that an employment practice is based on a reasonable factor other than age only after an employee has identified a specific policy or practice, and established that the practice harmed older workers substantially more than younger workers.

The final rule became effectifve April 30, 2012. For more information, you can read the final rule in its entirety.Questions and Answersregarding the new rule are also available. Our section on theADEA provides more information relating to age discrimination.

Charges of Employment Discrimination Reach All-Time High

Posted by admin on March 12, 2012  |   No Comments »

A record 99,947 charges of employment discrimination were filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) during fiscal year 2011.

Charges alleging retaliation under all the laws the EEOC enforces were the most numerous (37.4% of all charges), closely followed by charges involving claims of race discrimination (35.4%). While the numbers of charges with race and sex discrimination allegations declined from the previous year, charges with the two other most frequently-cited allegations, disability and age discrimination, both increased.

The agency’s enforcement of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) produced the highest increase in monetary relief among all of the laws. Back impairments were the most frequently cited impairment under the ADA, followed by other orthopedic impairments, depression, anxiety disorder and diabetes.

For the first full fiscal year of enforcement, the EEOC received 245 charges under the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of genetic information, including family medical history.

The EEOC is responsible for enforcing Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Equal Pay Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. For more information on these laws, please visit our section on Discrimination.

EEOC Launches Small Business Task Force to Expand and Enhance Assistance to Small Businesses

Posted by admin on February 10, 2012  |   No Comments »

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has launched a new internal task force that will focus on expanding and improving outreach and technical assistance to small businesses. The Small Business Task Force will work to find ways in which the agency can better collaborate with the small business community to ensure compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws.

The Task Force will, among other things, develop recommendations on how to:

- Utilize new technology to expand outreach to small businesses;
- Develop technical assistance and training initiatives for small businesses;
- Identify specialized approaches to aid small businesses owned by women and minorities;
- Identify specialized approaches for micro businesses, generally those with 50 or fewer employees; and
- Enhance small business information and training on the EEOC’s web site.

The Small Business Task Force plans to focus on newly established small businesses and those that are too small to afford lawyers or human resource personnel.

Anti-Discrimination Laws Enforced by EEOC
The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. The laws enforced by the EEOC apply to employers who meet the threshold number of employees for coverage.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act apply to employers who have at least 15 employees in 20 or more weeks of the calendar year.

- The Age Discrimination in Employment Act applies to employers with 20 or more employees.

- The Equal Pay Act does not contain a minimum number of employees for coverage.

- Additionally, employers with100 or more employees (50 if the employer is a government contractor) are required annually to file the EEO-1 Report, providing a breakdown of the workforce by race, sex, and national origin in nine broad job categories.

For information about the federal nondiscrimination laws enforced by the EEOC, you can contact the Commission’s small business liaisons or visit our section on Discrimination.

EEOC Announces Final Bipartisan Regulations for the ADA Amendments Act

Posted by admin on May 6, 2011  |   No Comments »

Regulations Implement Congressional Intent to Simplify Definition of Disability

WASHINGTON – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) final regulations to implement the ADA Amendments Act (ADAAA) are now available on the Federal Register website. Like the law they implement, the regulations are designed to simplify the determination of who has a “disability” and make it easier for people to establish that they are protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

“The ADAAA is a very important civil rights law,” said EEOC Chair Jacqueline A. Berrien. “The regulations developed by the Commission to implement the ADAAA clarify the requirements of the law for all stakeholders, which is one of the Commission’s most important responsibilities.”

“Based on the hard work we did at the Commission over the past months, I am confident that these regulations will work well for both people with disabilities and employers,” said Commissioner Chai Feldblum, who joined the EEOC in April, 2010. “It was our job as an agency to carry out the intent of this landmark law and I believe we have done so successfully.” Feldblum was one of the lead negotiators on the original ADA as well as on the Amendments Act.

“Just as the ADAAA was the result of a considerable bipartisan effort by Congress, the final rule represents a concerted effort of EEOC Commissioners representing both parties to arrive at regulations that hold true to that bipartisan Congressional intent,” said Commissioner Constance S. Barker. “I was pleased to have been able to vote in favor of the final rule.”

The ADAAA went into effect on Jan. 1, 2009. In the ADAAA, Congress directed the EEOC to revise its regulations to conform to changes made by the Act, and expressly authorized the EEOC to do so. The EEOC issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on proposed implementing regulations on September 23, 2009, and received well over 600 public comments in response. The final regulations reflect the feedback the EEOC received from a broad spectrum of stakeholders.

The ADAAA overturned several Supreme Court decisions that Congress believed had interpreted the definition of “disability” too narrowly, resulting in a denial of protection for many individuals with impairments such as cancer, diabetes or epilepsy. The ADAAA states that the definition of disability should be interpreted in favor of broad coverage of individuals. The effect of these changes is to make it easier for an individual seeking protection under the ADA to establish that he or she has a disability within the meaning of the ADA.

The ADAAA and the final regulations keep the ADA’s definition of the term “disability” as a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities; a record (or past history) of such an impairment; or being regarded as having a disability. But the law made significant changes in how those terms are interpreted, and the regulations implement those changes.

Based on the statutory requirements, the regulations set forth a list of principles to guide the determination of whether a person has a disability. For example, the principles provide that an impairment need not prevent or severely or significantly restrict performance of a major life activity to be considered a disability. Additionally, whether an impairment is a disability should be construed broadly, to the maximum extent allowable under the law. The principles also provide that, with one exception (ordinary eyeglasses or contact lenses), “mitigating measures,” such as medication and assistive devices like hearing aids, must not be considered when determining whether someone has a disability. Furthermore, impairments that are episodic (such as epilepsy) or in remission (such as cancer) are disabilities if they would be substantially limiting when active.

The regulations clarify that the term “major life activities” includes “major bodily functions,” such as functions of the immune system, normal cell growth, and brain, neurological, and endocrine functions. The regulations also make clear that, as under the old ADA, not every impairment will constitute a disability. The regulations include examples of impairments that should easily be concluded to be disabilities, such as HIV infection, diabetes, epilepsy, and bipolar disorder.

Following the dictates of the ADAAA, the regulations also make it easier for individuals to establish coverage under the “regarded as” part of the definition of “disability.” Establishing such coverage used to pose significant hurdles, but under the new law, the focus is on how the person was treated rather than on what an employer believes about the nature of the person’s impairment.

The Commission has released two Question-and-Answer documents about the regulations to aid the public and employers – including small business – in understanding the law and new regulations. The ADAAA regulations, accompanying Question and Answer documents and a fact sheet are available on the EEOC website at www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/adaaa_info.cfm.

The EEOC enforces the nation’s laws prohibiting employment discrimination. More information is available at www.eeoc.gov.

EEOC Enforcing ADA, Other Laws More Vigorously

Posted by admin on December 1, 2010  |   No Comments »

Thompson Publishing Group

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission said it is now resolving employee charges filed under federal civil rights laws almost as quickly as they are being filed — a significant change from previous years.

The EEOC is responsible for enforcing the Americans With Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Equal Pay Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.

Continue Reading…

EEOC Issues Final GINA Regulations

Posted by admin on November 9, 2010  |   No Comments »

New Jersey Employment Law Letter
Adria Martinelli and Julie Athey

After several delays, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued final regulations that interpret and implement the nondiscrimination requirements of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). For the most part, the final regulations don’t differ substantially from the ones proposed by the agency nearly two years ago. However, they do provide specific examples of what employers must do (and refrain from doing) to comply. Continue Reading…